Some of your friends and neighbors have expressed concern about the Plum Creek development in letters and articles in the Gainesville Sun. Follow the links below to read these opinions on the Gainesville Sun web site.
April 17, 2016, Together We Stand (Article in The Fine Print)
April 11, 2016, Not a final victory
March 18, 2016, Unfair and uninformed
March 15, 2016, Mike Byerly: Plum Creek plan wouldn’t reduce poverty
March 15, 2016, Immediate needs
March 11, 2016, Learning from mistakes
March 7, 2017, Worth the effort
March 1, 2016, Remain independent
February 25,2016,The most to lose
February 24, 2016, Cynical ploy
February 20,2016,Envision congestion
February 18, 2016,Line in the sand
February 16, 2016, Deny Plum Creek
February 14, 2016, Reject propaganda
February 14, 2016, Creative proposal
February 12, 2016, Bill Salmon: Plum Creek plan is a pig in a poke
February 12, 2016, Transformative vote
February 10, 2016, Self interest
February 8, 2016, Corruption will come
February 2, 2016, Burden on taxpayers
January 29, 2016, Contact commisioners
January 27, 2016, Robert Hutchinson: Re-envisioning Plum Creek’s plan
January 27, 2016, Closer to home
January 25, 2016, Plum Creek votes
January 21, 2016, Playing hardball
January 15, 2016, Karen Arrington: Insulting editorial distorted facts on Plum Creek
January 3, 2016, This is our plan
December 22, 2015, Ken Cornell: Despite vote, stay active in Plum Creek process
December 10, 2015, Selling us out
December 8, 2015, Kicking the can
December 6, 2015, Not obstruction
November 30, 2015, Larry Keen: Plum Creek uses evasive and deceptive tactics
November 24, 2015, James Thompson: Improving county is our job, not Plum Creeks’s
November 23, 2015, We deserve better
July 15, 2015, Inconsistent stands
June 9, 2015, Deceptive column
June 6, 2015, Larry Keen: Plum Creek mixes money with propaganda to win approval
April 17, 2015, Stick with the plan
February 8, 2015, Reject Plum Creek
January 25, 2015, More reasonable way
January 4, 2015, Half-baked ideas
November 8, 2014, Ray C. Hughes: Plum Creek seeks to boost land’s value, not develop it
October 29, 2014, Protect our water
October 26, 2014, Intensive forestry
October 25, 2014, Joe Little: Plum Creek is another outsider seeking to exploit environment
October 12, 2014, Follow the law
October 10, 2014, Consider our costs
October 7, 2014, Act accordingly
October 6, 2014, Stated intentions
October 4, 2014, Unsustainable model
October 3, 2014, Slick sales pitch
October 1, 2014, Laura Berkelman: Don’t build project in flood plains
September 30, 2014, Snake-oil salesman
September 28, 2014, Alternative plan
September 27, 2014, Massive intrusion
September 24, 2014, Mike Byerly: Plum Creek plan warrants denial, not a counteroffer
September 16, 2014, First dibs on water
September 14, 2014, Empty promises
September 12, 2014, We have a town
September 4, 2014, Fact-filled report
September 2, 2014, Plum Creek running a shell game
August 31, 2014, More problems
August 29, 2014, Pay close attention
August 24, 2014, Plum Creeks’s ploy
August 23, 2014, Larry Keen: Plum Creek using money and influence to win approval
August 22, 2014, Don’t get fooled
August 14, 2014, The great lie
August 3, 2014, According to Jake
June 22, 2014, Stand by Our Plan: Plum Creek threatens our comp plan
May 28, 2014, Entitlement lesson
May 25, 2014, Enough is enough
May 17, 2014, Coordinated campaign
April 29, 2014, Beware the hype
April 27, 2014, Mike Byerly: Plum Creek and comp plan offer very different visions
April 22, 2014, Unsuitable scale
April 17, 2014, Stick with the plan
April 6, 2014, Penalize Plum Creek
March 12, 2014, Damaging practices
March 9, 2014, The selling of urban sprawl
February 8, 2014, Reject Plum Creek
February 4, 2014, Reasonable questions
January 14, 2014, More suffering
January 7, 2014, Potential impact
January 3, 2014, Staggering toll
November 30, 2013, Envision the impact of sprawl on our rural communities
August 30, 2013, Dave Wilson: Envision Alachua promises sprawl at cost of water quality
August 6, 2012, What about the water?